Gen. Dachs Advance Guard lying in wait.. |
"At this stage of our war game saga it would not be amiss to stage a practical demonstration of how the rules as they have already been established govern an actual war game". I really can't argue with Charles Grant, so here goes..
But first, a special welcome to our first two followers, my old comrade LiverpoolDave and none other than Bob 'Portable Wargame' Cordery. It's an honour, and something of a responsibility*. I hope I can keep your interest!
A word on the rules: I decided to use Bob's 'Portable Napoleonic Wargame' brigade-level game, but I wanted to impart some flavour of the Seven Years' War period, especially its linear infantry tactics. Keeping things as simple as possible, I made only these changes:
(i) Infantry Square formation is not allowed.
(ii) Infantry in column may not 'charge' i.e. move to close combat. Column is for marching, not attacking.
(iii) Horse Artillery is not allowed.
(iv) I removed the modifier ( +1 or +2 ) for cavalry initiating close combat against infantry in Line - and did not use the 'infantry in line vs. Cavalry' hit resolution table. I considered a bonus for cavalry attacking infantry column, but the circumstances did not arise.
I thought these should be enough to ensure the infantry 'shook out' into line when approaching the enemy, and reflect their confidence in repelling cavalry with disciplined volley fire. Perhaps the 'no column attack' rule is a bit harsh? I admit I'm going with my dim and distant memory of Fredrician tactics; your comments welcome..
The battle for Tragers Grat, 1760
Transporting Bob's 'Porter's Ridge' scenario to the Cruel Wars in Higher Germany, we have the somewhat obscure battle for the equally obscure 'Tragers Grat'.
Having seen the opposing brigades of Generals Dachs and Erich von Kleist, and the contested terrain, in previous posts, we have Dachs and his Austrian advance guard of 'Grenzer' foot, artillery and 'rifles' positioned on the ridge and in the woods, awaiting their Prussian foe. And so to battle..
Turn 1 : enter von Kleist. Note Austrian 'rifles' in the woods - dozing! |
On Turn 2, the Austrian Hussars appeared at the Northern end of the road, and deployed into line. Nothing daunted, von Kleist's Uhlans charged - and in the ensuing close combat, the Hussars lost 1 SP, levelling things up. And so began an epic tussle between the two cavalry units, evenly matched - first one and then the other taking a hit and losing an SP or being being forced to retreat. The Uhlans were down to only 1 SP after Turn 3, but kept fighting back, and were only finally destroyed on Turn 7, leaving the Hussars themselves with only 1 SP remaining, and no doubt exhausted. Von Kleist's Uhlans had done their part heroically, keeping the flank of their infantry protected from the Austrian Hussars.
Meanwhile the Prussian infantry columns ( joined by 1st and 2nd Jager foot and with their gun in support) deployed off the road, formed battle line, and by Turn 3 began their assault on the Austrian position.
Turn 3: Prussians Deploy. Uhlans and Hussars hotly engaged at top right |
Austrian reinforcements arrived in the form of their two 'Wildganse' Jager foot units on turn 4 and turn 5, from West (the ridge) and North (the road), but on turn 4 disaster struck - their gun having been first swept by FreiKorps Musketry, then took a second hit from the Prussian gun, and was destroyed! A big loss to the defenders of the ridge. However, this blow was softened by the subsequent performance of the Prussian gunners, who spent the next 4 four turns firing at the Grenzer foot on the ridge and throwing a succession of '1's , missing every time!
The Prussian foot meanwhile advanced steadily, preferring to sweep the ridge with their formidable musketry rather than venture an uphill charge and close combat at subsequent disadvantage. The Grenzers, joined by 1st 'WIldganse' jagers, returned fire equally steadily, and both gave and took casualties and temporary retreats. The Austrian rifles' sniping delayed the Prussian advance, but even with the cover of the woods they were gradually forced back by the weight of fire from the Prussian line battalions. Casualties mounted on both sides, but with Prussians getting more luck with 'retreat' results rather than SP losses, and by the end of turn 7 the Austrians had lost 7 SP (against their 'Exhaustion Point' of 9) to the Prussians 5 .
Turn 6 : Austrian reinforcements in action, musketry all along the line. |
And so Turn 9 saw a conclusion - the Prussian gunners finally found the range and took 1 SP from the Grenzer foot on the ridge, so the Austrians were certain to reach exhaustion. The rifles were further pushed back, and indeed out of the woods, by another charge of Prussian Jagers, and the other Prussian Jager unit's musketry hit and destroyed their Austrian counterparts on the ridge. General Dachs' defenders were thus well and truly exhausted, and the position on the ridge looking uncertain. The Austrian Grenzers managed to stave off disaster at the last throw, however - their fire removed one final SP from von Kleist's Frei Korps foot, and pushed the Prussians to exhaustion in their turn.
Turn 9 : Final Situation, mutual exhaustion! |
Next time - the after action analysis. Confidential report by Herr Pundit von Lineker, Head of Intelligence..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*'but how shall we **** off, oh Lord?'
A great battle report!
ReplyDeleteI like the changes you have made to adapt the rules for the SYW; they make a lot of sense and seem to work well.
It is interesting to compare the results of the original Battle of Porter’s Ridge with the outcome of your refight.
All the best,
Bob
Thank you very much for your kind words and support, Bob! I enjoyed playing the rules, and the changes seemed to work OK; I will discuss them in my next post.
DeleteIt does indeed look like a lot of fun. I enjoyed reading the battle report and look forward to the punditry (will Herr Lineker nominate a 'Man of the Battle' or will we be talking about how VAR should have been consulted for that Austrian gun hit?). Out of curiosity, how long did it take to fight the battle?
ReplyDeleteThanks very much, Dave! As you know I have no football knowledge whatsoever, so I will probably leave it there.
ReplyDeleteAs to the time taken, probably between 2 and 3 hours, but this was the first game I've done in a very long time(!), and I was also learning the rules. Plus making notes as I went - several pages of my hobby notebook now say things like '1 Klst hold, Fire 1 Jag Hit Rtrt". Most enjoyable, anyway!
Your table really looks the part. Games certainly don’t have to be big to be fun and tactical filled.
ReplyDeleteThank you very much! I agree games don't have to be large to be interesting and fun. I have been pleased to start small - and no room to go much bigger anyway!
Delete