All a bit quiet here recently, partly due to a pleasant week's holiday in Northumberland; as it turned out, there was quite a lot of what might be called 'hobby interest' there. I suppose if you go anywhere in Britain, there will be history waiting to be discovered, of course - but Northumberland seems to have had more than its share! Unsurprising, perhaps, given its location close to the English/Scottish border, the scene of centuries of warfare.
The area is peppered with fortifications of various ages, styles and states of repair: a great example was the village of Elsdon, in Redesdale, within a handful of miles of our cottage ( which was in Coquetdale ). A walk fron the village started close to a well-preserved Norman motte and bailey:
In fact the village, rather picturesque now, is a completely militarised landscape. The motte and bailey is on the right, and in the centre the large building is a Pele tower ( fortified manor house ) dating from the early 15th Century - the neighbouring church has thick walls so as to be defensible, and the the village green ( left ) was surrounded by a defensive wall too. They were well-prepared to see off any Scots raiders, Reivers or 'Moss Troopers'. The churchyard also revealed a mass-grave, probably of casualties from the battle of Otterburn ( 'Chevy Chase' ) nearby in 1388.
The Norman castle at Elsdon was built by Robert de Umfraville, soon after the conquest, but abandoned by about 1160 as his descendents moved to nearby Harbottle, where we also visited the ruins of their stone castle.
Mind you, it did them no good, as the new castle was beseiged and taken by the Scots in 1174, only a few years after it was built! the castle fell into decay after the accession of James VI of Scotland to the throne of England in 1605, which presumably brought peace to the region, after hundreds of years of strife. Until 1689, 1715 and 1745, that is!
Moving forward a little in time, we also visited the splendid National Trust property of Wallington, home of the splendidly intellectual and eccentric Trevelyan family, and childhood home of historian G.M. Trevelyan, whose histories of Marlborough's wars and of Garibaldi will be known to many. It's a good visit for anyone, and the Walled Garden is a particular highlight if gardens are your thing - we were lucky to see it in mid/late June, peak flowering season. But there is a bonus, especially for readers of this blog. In the former servants hall, we saw this:
"20 mil Semi-Flats sir, thousands of 'em!" |
The guide book explains :
"The collection of model soldiers, now totalling 3,800, was acquired in the early 1880s for the three sons of George Otto Trevelyan - Charles, Robert and George. They were made in Germany.
The boys set them out on the floor of the Museum above the Saloon, following plans of actual battles of the Marlborough and Napoleonic Wars. Books were used to represent hills. Careful calculations were made as to the correct fire-power of the guns and the agreed number of soldiers laid low at each volley: a battle might therefore take several days to complete.
French infantry looking more 1880s than 1815 ? |
Plenty of Cuirassiers! |
It was to this study of the game of Kriegspiel that G.M. Trevelyan attributed his own capacity for so vividly describing battles, and both he and Sir Charles gave Kriegspiel as their hobby in Who's Who, even as adults.
and 'Prussian Guards' Grenadiers |
The soldiers are today laid out in regiments of Napoloeon's, Blucher's and Wellington's armies, exactly as Sir Charles left them in the Musuem."
and sets of ( surprisingly tiny ) kriegspiel blocks |
Impressive stuff, and 25 years before H.G. Wells! Though of course, Kriegspiel was around well before that. The figures looked to me about 20mm ( maybe 25mm? ) and 'semi-flat' style, there was no information on the makers apart from 'German'. Would any experts out there like to hazard a guess? Much of the French infantry are uniformed in contemporary ( c.1880s ) style, but I'm sure they performed splendidly under the command of Bonaparte!
Now on to the 1940s: we spent a lovely sunny afternoon at Almouth beach, where we found another relic of our island's warlike history - a nice grouping of 1940 vintage concrete anti-tank cubes. These were part of the very rapidly-contrstructed defences which were installed all along the South and East coasts of Britain following the defeat of France - we are familiar with them on East Anglian beaches too.
these are rather scupltural - good use of corrugated iron! |
The sheer amount of effort that must have gone into these things, in a very short timescale, is impressive - but when confronted with them so far North, I have my doubts about them. Would Hitler have really tried to land an army here? The whole point of The Battle of Britain being that air supremacy was a pre-requisite for successful landings, there was surely, simply no chance of the Lufwaffe being able to put effective ( i.e. single-seater ) fighter cover over beaches and sea-lanes so far North - they just wouldn't have the range. That must have been known at the time, so one wonders why so much effort was put into these defences. I suspect it was perhaps more about stiffening morale at home, and 'being seen to be doing something'. Does anyone have a view, or specialist knowledge, on that?
So there we are - a very pleasant week in Northumberland ( we were very lucky with the weather!), with lots of historical/hobby interest thrown in. All those castles, pele towers and defensible churches, and the general landscape, gave me ideas. Must dig out my copy of 'The Steel Bonnets' and learn about the Border Reivers and their exploits. Hmmm, would it make a Portable '3 X 3' Wargame? Keep well, and safe, everyone.
I really enjoyed the post and the pictures. Quite a toy soldier find.
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to seeing the border reivers in action…
Alan Tradgardland
Thanks Alan, glad you enjoyed it! Gaming the Reivers could be a longer-term project, as I have not even read the book and have no suitable figures- though I admit your recent pics of those nice Lammings gave me ideas! The Trevelyan collection was really interesting, worth a look if you are in the area and a member of the National Trust.
DeleteHi David, there was always the chance of a German attack on the North east coastline, although primarily as a diversion I assume. Making all those defences would definitely have been good for morale though - as you say. Some lovely pictures of the area - I think you’ve stolen our blue skies!
ReplyDeleteThanks JBM, we were very lucky with the weather. We went about 15 years ago and got rained on all week, so they owed us a good week! I guess both sides might have seen a landing as possible, and 'better safe than sorry' was the British attitude, especially after the shock of May 1940.
DeleteDavid,
ReplyDeleteOriginally my part of the world (bit further north - Beadnell) although I alarmingly realised I have lived longer in the South and Midlands than in the North. Beautiful but remote....
The coast defences. Extensive pillboxes and anti-tank blocks were installed along all the beaches of the NE coast. Many were destroyed (as in Beadnell) when the dunes rendered them unsafe. The fear was (IIRC) of landings from Norway. How serious this was I don't know. The beach defenses were extensive. As with all things, the internet can provide more:
http://www.pillbox-study-group.org.uk
Neil
Thanks Neil, yes indeed beautiful and remote - it felt a very long drive back to Suffolk. Thanks for the link to Pillbox Study Group, I am quite likely to spend several highly educational hours on that one! ( and they have a 'spotters guide', folks! )
DeleteThis is a great post - excellent stuff. As far as the invasion threat goes, early in the war the Scottish beaches were mined in anticipation of an attack from Norway, which could never have been feasible (hindsight is a great thing), but the threat was taken very seriously. The farm where I live is on the East Lothian coast, and it features excellent concrete roads, built by the government in 1939/40 to allow access to the observation posts and coastguard sites on the beaches. Someone did an excellent selling job there. There is also a story that in 1939 there was a complaint from the local council about mines being washed up on North Berwick beach. Reply from the Coastguard claimed that any mines which came adrift were *usually* disarmed, but as a cover-all made the point that there was a war on.
ReplyDeleteMust check the Redesdale area out again - of late, any time I have been there I've been on my way to somewhere else. There was a little trouble on the Scottish border around 1639 too...
Thanks Tony, interesting stuff! I suppose they couldn't rule out a landing anywhere, really and perhaps the importance of air cover was not so obvious early in the war, until the Battles of France and Britain made it obvious. Certainly by the time the allies were landing in Sicily.and Italy, the operational radius of the fighter planes protecting the landing forces was a crucial factor in deciding the feasibility of a landing location. Anyway, as you said, various contractors did very well - the 'PPE' of its day?
DeleteFirst German planes shot down on British soil in WW2 were both within a short distance of here, on raids from Stavanger.
DeleteGreat pictures David. My eyes popped out of my head when I saw that first picture of the toy soldiers though.
ReplyDeleteI remember anti-tank blocks like that at the north end of the promenade at Cleethorpes. Long gone now. And the pier, formerly 1/4 mile long, was truncated to a mere 100 yards lest the frightful Hun land there.
thanks Chris, yes the Trevelyan collection was quite something!
DeleteI am now trying to imagine a Panzer III storming Cleethorpes Pier..
Brilliant post David. I really enjoyed your pictures and information.
ReplyDeleteThanks Richard, really glad you enjoyed it. Goes to show there is history all around us!
Delete