Before I was so easily distracted by the Eighteenth Century, I had always meant to resume wargaming with the 'Pike and Shot' era, and in particular the English Civil War / Thirty Years War period, of around 1620 to 1650.
Like most British gamers I suspect, my first contact with the period would have been from reading about the ECW, which is of course the wrong name, given extensive Scottish and Irish involvement. 'The Wars of the Three Kingdoms' is a bit of a mouthful, but more appropriate. By the way, does anyone have a better suggestion? King Charles' Wars, perhaps? He was at the centre of most of them, and conveniently his successor after he lost his head was also Charles ('King Charles'- now where have I heard that recently?). I remember Stuart Asquith's series of articles in 'Battle for Wargamers' circa 1978 were quite inspiring. But for me, there was a turning point when I chanced upon C.V. Wedgewood's The Thirty Years War, when I was about 18. I had no idea of that war's existence beforehand, I had no knowledge of the political structure of Europe (especially Germany) at the time, and I was rather entranced by what seemed a ruritanian fantasy forerunner of the present polity. As Wedgewood described the multitude of city-states and principalities that made up the Holy Roman Empire, I couldn't quite believe it wasn't all just an invented story, and really happened - and it was fascinating. Sweden as a super-power? A fairy story, surely? And the characters - Gustavus Adolphus, Wallenstein, Tilly, Richelieu, poor Frederick Palatine 'The Winter King' of Bohemia and his plucky ( English ) wife , crafty old Maximilian of Bavaria, the Emperors Ferdinand father and son, dashing French Generals Conde and Turenne - I'm afraid Charles, Rupert, Fairfax and even Cromwell couldn't compete, I was always going to 'do' 30YW from then on.
I collected Pike and Shot forces in 15mm, which was quite new back then - I have some early Minifigs and a few Peter Laing figures, and quite a few chunky 'Mikes Models' ( predecessors of Essex Miniatures, I think? ). More recently I've added some modern Essex and Peter Pig figures - many of which still await painting. An Imperialist army seemed an obvious choice, but I managed to avoid picking Swedes as their opponent - with their salvo-firing foot and hard-charging cavalry, they seemed a bit too 'super-hero'ish. I plumped for the French - I think I liked the idea that they were perhaps rather showily-dressed, and of the elan that won their stunning victory at Rocroi.
So, now I'm ready to give pike and shot another go, and see how I get on. From the many rule sets accumulated over the years ( see my previous post ) I am going to give Philip Garton's In Deo Veritas a try. As stated before, it is heavily influenced by Frank Chadwick's classic Volley and Bayonet, and it allows 'big' battles to be fought - my current collection looks to be just about big enough to start playing. Helpfully, the rules have four suggested scenarios of historical battles to recreate, so why not use one of those? I think I have sufficient forces for the ECW battle of Cheriton - but of course, my troops are supposed to be Imperial and French. So, with a little help from Google Translate, welcome to Kirchendorf, somewhere in the Rhineland.. The (somewhat dour?) Imperialists will take the part of Parliament, while the Royalists become the (more flamboyant) French - that seems fairly appropriate.
To give an idea, here is a slightly wobbly photo of the page from the In Deo Veritas rulebook showing the suggested terrain ( I hope this is not violating any copyrights, if requested I will happily remove the picture ). Note the large wooded area, and that the Southern part of the table is higher ground.
Imperialists/Parliament deploy in the South , and French/Royalists in the North
The basic tactical unit in the rules is the Brigade ( smaller units designated 'companies' ), and for this scenario the opposing forces are as follows:
Imperialist ( Parliament ) : 10 brigades cavalry, 6 brigades infantry, 2 companies Dragoons, 2 batteries Field Artillery.
French ( Royalist ) : 8 brigades cavalry, 6 brigades infantry, 1 battery Field Artillery.
Each side has one of their foot brigades deployed as 3 'companies' of detached Musketeers, in the wooded area.
These forces represent armies of about 10,000 and 8,500 respectively, so we have a not-too-big 'big' battle, which should be a good introduction. I have just about enough figures to make up these forces, where a 'brigade' stand measures 75 by 40mm. I can get about 6 cavalry and 16 infantry figures to represent a brigade , with 3 dragoon or 4 infantry figures per 'company'. Fortunately my troops are based mainly in threes and fours rather than whole units for other rules, so my previous regiments and squadrons could be broken down into the multiple 'brigades' represented in these rules.
Having worked all that out, now here are the Imperialists :
Painters of a sensitive disposition may wish to look away now. Please excuse the dubious painting, (especially the flags) - I was very young, and it was a long time ago, before highlights and washes were invented.. But I am going to keep them just as they are, as they are a connection with times long past. A little test of figure identification: I think the majority are Mikes Models, but the sky blue coated foot unit at the back is mainly early Minifigs ( the standard-bearer may be Peter Laing? ), the red-coated unit are later Minifigs, and the dark blue coated unit from Frei Korps, all late 1970s/early 1980s vintage. Not sure about the guns and gunners! I'm pleased to say that MacFarlane's Scottish Foot and Horse will make their debut too, the Scots having obviously agreed a good price for their services from the Emperor.
And their French opponents:
Another mixed bag of figures - I think the foot are mostly Mikes Models ( with a few more recent Essex among them ), this time it's the cavalry that are varied. The left wing horse units (nearest camera) include Peter Pig, Essex, and two generations of Minifigs. Over on the other wing, Cuirassiers are backed-up by the King's Musketeers, and some (perhaps anachronistic) Chevaux Leger lancers.
I think we can sum up the opposing forces as - a right old mixture!
Having sorted out the rules and figures, next we need the battlefield. The rules assume a 6 ft by 4ft table, but I have only 3ft by 3ft, so some adjustment is necessary. I propose to simply halve the movement and shooting distances, so I have the equivalent of 6ft by 6ft. I've kept the the unit 'footprints' unchanged ( Brigades 75mm by 40mm ) , so in effect they are double the expected size. I thought that making them half-size too would make a 'brigade' into a single rank of 4 infantry, which wouldn't look (half) so good. So, I just have to hope that doesn't cause any rules issues. We'll see..
I had a first go at setting a table based on the scenario map, and it looks ( with a somewhat creased terrain cloth, that will need sorting out! ) something like this:
Hopefully you can just about see that the Southern part of the battlefield is slightly higher ground, by dint of the good old-school 'books under the cloth' method. Having looked at it, I am wondering if the woods are a bit large, given the number of units each side has to deploy - and only the three detached musketeer units for each side will deploy in the woods. I may decide to shuffle the woodland to the East, shrinking it to give the main forces a bit more elbow room.
So there we are, the basics of a battle, I hope. A few variables that may or may not cause problems, but there's only one way to find out - give it a try!
If all goes well, my next post will be the battle report - though I'm afraid a lot of 'events, dear boy, events' may get in the way, as they have been doing for the past few weeks. So I apologise in advance if there is a bit of a pause before that next post appears. But I'm certainly looking forward to giving thse rules a try, and giving my polyglot vintage armies their first proper 'go' in a long time! Until then, keep safe, and well, everyone.
Very interested to hear you say that the rules are influenced by the classic volley and bayonet - a fine set of rules / scenarios. Look forward to your game and the effect of scaling.
ReplyDeleteI sure wish I had kept more of my stuff and still had some legacy armies from younger days.
Thanks Norm, I like the rules from an initial reading, and am hoping the ground scale adjustments don't have too much effect.
DeleteI suppose I still have my 'early' collection because I didn't collect any more for many years, so no pressure to dispose of them! Glad I kept them, they are a nice piece of personal 'heritage' and can now get some use, too.
They look glorious to me! So glad that the Scots have finally found a good home again. Their first home some 45 years ago was also a 30 Yrs setting since they ended up being too late to fight for Montrose. Oddly enough the Lancers were all recruited from Heritage Landwehr cavalry....
ReplyDeleteI look forward to the battle reports.
Thanks Ross, I was determined to make use of your Scots! Interesting about the lancers too. Let's see how they do in the service of the Emperor..
DeleteDavid, good to see you rekindling your affection for an old flame. The Cheriton map looks reasonable to me without going down to my library to pull books off the shelf. I vaguely recall from my readings that the area to the west of the woods actually formed a bowl with lower ground surrounded by higher ground to both north and south. Of course, having fallen victim to illness From recent travels, I may be in a state of delirium.
ReplyDeleteAwaiting the BatRep…
Thanks Jon, I think you are right about the Cheriton terrain - I think maybe the scenario has assumed the Royalists have already moved forward into the 'bowl'. It'll be interesting to see how it turns out. Hope you are feeling better!
DeleteNice to see an old collection getting game time and looking forward to hearing how the game and rules work out.
ReplyDeletethanks Peter, I am pleased to finally get these chaps onto a gaming table, and it will be interesting to see how it goes. I am also planning to give 'Twilight of the Divine Right' rules a go, as they are 'big battle' rules too.
DeleteA excellent distraction if I may say so. I look forward to the battle report.
ReplyDeleteAlan Tradgardland
Thanks Alan, I hope the battle and subsequent report does not disappoint!
DeleteYour armies look splendid - I look forward to their adventures. What is this "highlights and washes" thing of which you speak, by the way?
ReplyDeleteThanks Tony, I have high hopes for this venture. You called my bluff on 'highlights and washes', I admit I have no idea about them..
DeleteThere’s a nice old school look about those armies David.
ReplyDeleteCheriton is my favourite go to ECW battle. Played it 3 or 4 times. I even walked the site a few years ago. Highly recommended as the area hasn’t been built over and it’s very attractive scenery in it’s own right.
Chris/Nundanket
Thanks Chris, that's a good point about walking the site, it's a nice part of the world. Long ago I lived in Basingstoke for a while so I know the area, should have gone then!
DeleteNothing wrong with the painting David; just look at some of the "professionally painted" figures on eBay - yours would put them to shame being very neat and tidy. BTW some of the Mike's Models are still available from Essex Miniatures if you needed reinforcements .
ReplyDeleteVnB were a fairly flexible set of rules for scales. As they work on the basis of a single base, there were variants for wing and regimental scales where ground scale changed so that ranges increased, but because the time scale was reduced, movement distances didn't.
So if you are reducing movement and ranges by 50% say, you will in effect be increasing both ground and time scales and your units are the next stage up (regiment becomes brigade). It would only be distortive if you changed say ranges but not movement distances as well.
Neil
Thanks Neil, you are very kind about my painting. Maybe those sellers on ebay are being 'economical with the actualite'... You are right about Mike's Models still being available, though I have simply used a leavening of current Essex figures to fill the ranks when needed, and they have been OK.
DeleteI hope the slight tweak to the rules distances won't cause any problems - like V&B, the movement rates for 'In Deo Veritas' are quite high and wouldn't suit a large table, so I didn't have much choice. I am a bit concerned that the large numbers of units may be a bit cramped in the small space, but it will at least encourage the proper use of 1st, 2nd and even 3rd lines in the deployment!
Love your armies. I never repaint my early painting efforts either. I keep them as a history of my development in the hobby... sad but true.
ReplyDeleteReally looking forward to your battle report, and your analysis of the rules.
Thanks Richard, I agree about keeping original paint jobs (though I have re-done my really poor 'Prussian' 7YW infantry, to save their shame!). I am happy to keep them as a memento of happy younger days. We'll see how they, and the rules ( and me! ) perform in the battle..
DeleteWe’ve all been distracted by the 18th century. It happens. 😀
ReplyDeleteThe troops and table look good to me.
I am very unfamiliar with the pike and shot era so can’t type anything intelligent.
Good luck with the scenario!
thanks ( belatedly ) Stew. Charles Grant and Peter Young distracted a lot of us, a long time ago. I am hopeful for the rules, at least - the scenario may need a bit of tweaking given my compact table!
Delete